There are a lot of disappointed Kings fans this week, thanks
to Mike Malone being fired as the head coach.
There are a lot of things that just stink about this move, starting with
the fact that their recent losing streak coincided with Boogie Cousins missing
like 11 games due to Ebola. Kings fans
should be mad, yes. Firing your coach 24
games into the season never works out well; just ask the Lakers and Mike Brown. However, let’s hone in on the truth, here. There is one reason and one reason only for
Kings fans to be mad about the firing of Mike Malone: Good coaches don’t sign up to coach teams
owned by egomaniacs who don’t know WTF they want and are quick to fire coaches. We’ve seen this over and over again with the
Oakland Raiders. When was the last time
the Raiders hired a coach who is capable of coaching a good NFL team? That’s because coaching the Raiders is like
being the White House press secretary:
you’ll eventually get fired for something your boss did.
With that said, Kings fans should not fret over losing Mike
Malone. His firing is not hurting the
team right now. The Kings were, in fact,
NOT on the right track. Their last 2
first round picks are still lost, Jason Terry basically refused to suit up
unless he’s traded (which is saying a lot coming from a guy who hasn’t been
relevant since 2010) and the team has a habit of taking a 1st half
lead and crashing hard in the 2nd half. The 5-1 start was a total fluke. The only reason the Kings are noticeably better
this year than last year is because Boogie learned this summer that you can’t
be a bitch-ass, poopy diaper havin’-ass, lower lip quivering, 7 foot tall baby
throwing a constant tantrum, and expect anybody to take you seriously,
especially the referees.
Kings fans should be mad, but they should be mad about
something more serious than the head coach.
The Malone firing shed a spotlight on the ownership. Take a good, hard look at this Ranadive guy: Billionaire owner, philanthropist, tech-business
guru, former youth girls basketball coach, and inventor of half a dozen stupid “outside
the box” ideas on how to run an NBA franchise.
Everything I’ve read about the guy tells me he’s a fucking joke. Here
are some of his innovative strategies on how to make the Sacramento Kings the
NBA team of the future:
1. “Positionless basketball”. Fucking genius, right?. Could you imagine a team with, like,
7-footers playing guard on offense? (ummm, you mean like OKC, Dallas, Milwaukee?),
or guards playing down low in the post? (umm you mean like Kobe Byrant has been
doing for years?). It’s like this guy
just realized that NBA players are incredibly talented at playing basketball,
and he thinks he’s the first one to figure it out.
2. Use their cap space on B-list players like Rudy
Gaye with bad contracts. Why? Because the
salary cap will go up eventually, B-list players are better than C-list
players, and A-list players aren’t really interested in signing with the Kings…
yet! Holy smokes, that’s genius! Now if only they could swing a trade for Josh
Smith, they’ll be 4 players away from a good starting 5. I’m not sure where GM Pete D’Allisandro was
when the Brooklyn Nets tried this with Deron Williams, Joe Johnson, and Brook
Lopez, resulting in the only NBA franchise reporting a net operating loss in
2013 and a currently terrible roster who they would love to trade but can’t
because NBA GM’s learned that you can’t sign Lebron without a shitload of cap
space.
4. Bitcoin!
Be the first NBA team to accept bitcoin!
OK. Pretty sure this guy’s first
assumption about Sacramento is that it’s somewhere in the Silicon Valley and
that everyone in Sacramento is a software engineer. Nobody in Sacramento uses bitcoin, and 80% of
Sacramento is underemployed hipsters.
5. The much publicized “Play defense 4 on 5, with a
full time cherry picker”. Wow, that’s a
stroke of genius there. This is the kind
of idea Cartman would come up with.
Every fat 4th grader has tried this, only to realize that
after maybe one basket, the other team figures out how to counter it, and your
teammates get tired of chasing up and down the court while you stand there. The game eventually ends early because nobody
is having fun.
Here’s the really funny thing about
this idea: I first read about Ranadive
floating this idea out there in the off season via Zach Lowe on Grantland. After the Mike Malone firing, Bleacher Report
leaked another article about how they’re gonna make a push for it with the new head
coach in tow. Nobody really ridiculed
the guy for it the first time around, and everyone is now using his persistence
for the idea as evidence that the guy is a wacky, overbearing micro manager. Now there are articles popping up about the
guy all on Forbes about how he takes pride in turning around his 12-year old
daughter’s basketball team, having never touched a basketball in his life, by
running a full court press. Ummm? Full court press kills against girls who can’t
really dribble or pass. Really, all this is telling me is that he
knows very little about basketball and is super lost about how it works.
I know he’s a smart guy, but I feel
like this needs to be spelled out for him.
Teenage girls’ basketball can barely be considered the same sport as NBA
basketball. There’s a big difference
between coaching strategy for girls who barely have the arm strength to get the
basketball over the rim, and men who can cover the entire length of the court
in 5 dribbles. Now, it’s hard enough to
guard NBA players playing 5 on 5. You
can certainly try playing 4 on 5 defense, but if you leave a big man as your
cherry picker, you’re gonna have a really hard time getting a defensive
rebound. If you leave a guard player as
your cherry picker, the other team just has to pass around the 3 point line a
few times and they’ll get a guaranteed open shot, of which they’ll probably
make 70%. If you go with this strategy
for a entire game, there’s a chance you might give up 200 points. You, on the other hand, will not score 200
points, because all the other team has to do to neutralize your cherry picker
is guard the outlet pass and send their fastest player to leak out early on D
after a shot goes up to intercept the outlet pass.
The NBA ownership terrain in
California has shifted significantly in the past few years, with new ownership
for the Warriors, Kings, Clippers, and to a certain extent, the LA Kobe’s. So far, the verdict is out on former
Microsoft CEO and current Clipsow owner Steve Ballmer, who seems content to rip
a few rails of white china before going to a game and screaming his eyeballs
out when Blake Griffin dunks on fools.
The Warriors ownership took some bumps, but they’re looking like geniuses
now after dumping Mark Jackson for Steve Kerr and getting building plans
approved in San Francisco so they can occupy the gaping sports market left by
the 49ers. The Buss Family? Welll……
Jim Buss is pretty dumb, but the Lakers are the Lakers and Jeanie will
eventually figure out a way to make Jim let Mitch Kupchak do his job. They’ll and figure out life after Kobe. Vivek Ranadive? Something tells me he never watched
basketball until the Lebron hype machine made its way to India, which would be
fine if he wasn’t an egomaniacal billionaire who wants his stamp on everything,
as NBA owners tend to be. Sacramento hit
the lottery with an ownership group who wants to build a new stadium, but lost
it in the sense that this guy doesn’t seem like he’ll be very good at owning a
basketball franchise.
No comments:
Post a Comment